Saving time in the Security department!?

Careless e-mail use costs time, money and reputation: a data breach can quickly require 20 to 40 hours of internal investigation.
Frustrated Security Officer

Over the past week we have spoken to many companies that have a serious problem with staffing in the ICT/Security department. Too few employees and too many questions and problems are the cause. Most problems arise from human error and often originate with e-mail. Below is an overview of the time taken by one incorrectly sent e-mail.

Time investment in the event of a data breach due to improperly sent e-mail

  1. Direct investigation (incident investigation)
    • Ranging from several hours to even several days, depending on the sensitivity of the data and whether the recipient(s) opened the message, forwarded it, etc.
    • Usually coordination is needed between the IT department, the data protection officer (FG) / privacy officer, legal department and sometimes external (security) specialists.
  2. Communication and reporting
    • If necessary, affected individuals should also be informed (this may require additional time and coordination).
  3. Internal monitoring and measures
    • Updates in protocols, training/awareness for employees, modification of technical security measures, etc.
    • This can range from a few extra hours of work (adjustments in procedures, training) to several working days if new tools or processes need to be implemented.

Average estimate: In practice, several FGs/privacy experts indicate that, for an average company, you can easily spend 20 to 40 hours of internal time investigating, reporting, consulting and communicating around one mis-sent e-mail. In larger organizations (where more departments and stakeholders are involved), this can add up to several weeks, especially if highly sensitive data (e.g., medical or financial data) is involved.

Rather not via email

Therefore, in many cases, it is preferable not to send sensitive files via regular e-mail at all. That’s because e-mail by its very nature is not designed with the highest security standards in mind. A document that inadvertently lands in the wrong inbox can lead directly to reputational damage, loss of customer trust and time-consuming internal handling. Consider investigating the extent of the leak, notifying affected individuals, and preparing official notifications to the AP.

Especially in sectors such as healthcare, finance and government, where confidential data is involved, the risks are high. If the data is extremely sensitive, such a data breach can cost much more time and money. Moreover, these incidents are often accompanied by strict oversight or additional scrutiny from regulators.

Fortunately, there are ways to mitigate these risks. For example, Msafe offers a secure solution for sharing documents without having to include them as attachments in your mail. This is because with Msafe, files are securely stored in an encrypted environment and recipients receive a secure link and an SMS. This allows you to set exactly who has access and for how long, and limits the risk of human error.

Minimize risk and save time

  • Do not send sensitive files via regular e-mail: the risk of data leakage is too high.
  • Careless mail use costs time, money and reputation: a data breach can quickly require 20 to 40 hours of internal investigation.
  • Msafe minimizes these risks: by sharing confidential documents via a secure platform instead of sending them as loose attachments.

Want to learn more about how Msafe helps your organization with secure file management and preventing data breaches? Then feel free to contact us or request a no-obligation demo.

Share:

More Posts

KPMG research- why compliance in 2026 calls for Secure File Sharing
Blog

KPMG study: why compliance in 2026 calls for Secure File Sharing

Why is a Secure File Sharing solution indispensable in a good compliance policy? KPMG says in essence, organizations are facing more compliance pressures, increased privacy and cybersecurity requirements, and a growing need for monitoring, reporting and control. Our Msafe Secure File Transfer solution is perfect for an environment where sensitive files are exchanged encrypted, access-controlled and fully traceable.

Read More »
Automate secure file sharing with the Msafe API
Blog

Automate secure file sharing with the Msafe API

More and more organizations want to automate file sharing. No longer manually uploading, sending and storing, but rather integrating secure file sharing directly into existing processes and systems. Msafe’s API makes this possible. Through an API, applications can automatically upload, share and link files to internal systems such as CRM or document management systems.

Read More »
Can the US simply access Msafe data
Blog

Can the US just access Msafe data?

Your data resides with Msafe on Microsoft Azure in the Netherlands, with Microsoft Ireland as the contracting party. Yet we often hear the question: can U.S. legislation, such as the U.S. CLOUD Act, affect the sovereignty of customer data? In this article we clearly explain what the U.S. can and cannot enforce, why data location is not the same as jurisdiction, and how often this occurs in practice. We also show what measures Msafe deploys to minimize risk: EU hosting, client-side/end-to-end encryption, strict access with MFA and policies, and full audit trails. So that you can share securely and remain demonstrably compliant.

Read More »
why email is obsolete technology
Blog

Why email is obsolete technology

Email is still the default channel in virtually every organization, but it was technically and organizationally designed for an Internet where “trust” was the default. In 2026, the reality is different: email is at once productivity inhibitor, risk accelerator and compliance headache.

Read More »
Alternative to Zivver?
Blog

Alternative to Zivver?

Msafe Secure File Transfer is especially a logical alternative to Zivver
when you want to standardize file exchange with externals with strong governance and EU hosting as an explicit starting point.

Read More »