Alternative to Zivver?

Msafe Secure File Transfer is especially a logical alternative to Zivver when you want to standardize file exchange with externals with strong governance and EU hosting as an explicit starting point.
Alternative to Zivver?

Is Msafe an alternative to Zivver? Since Zivver became part of the Kiteworks group in June 2025, some organizations have been reconsidering their approach to secure file sharing. The reason is not necessarily that there is “something wrong” with Zivver, but that an acquisition may force a new consideration of risk. Think corporate governance, supply chain responsibility and (potential) jurisdiction may change. That while requirements from AVG/GDPR, NIS2 and industry-specific frameworks are actually getting stricter.

We now regularly get the question: is Msafe Secure File Transfer an alternative to Zivver? To answer this properly, it is important to understand that they are fundamentally two different solutions.

Technical differences: secure e-mail versus secure file transfer

At its core, Zivver is a secure e-mail solution that enriches your e-mail client (Microsoft 365/Outlook or Gmail) with encryption, recipient authentication and human error prevention (data loss prevention / human error prevention). In addition, Zivver can send large files via a secure link.

Msafe Secure File Transfer is, at its core, managed file transfer / secure file sharing: a controlled exchange lane for documents with strong encryption, access control, revocable access and extensive audit trails (who shared what, when accessed, downloaded, etc.).

Briefly:

  • Zivver primarily secures the email channel (with strong prevention before sending).
  • Msafe primarily standardizes document exchange (with governance, logging and policy in place).

Management differences

Zivver you can implement along two main tracks:

  1. Client integration (Outlook/M365 or Gmail): users continue to work in their mail client, with Zivver features in the workflow.
  2. Zivver Encryption Gateway: you enforce policy via mail flow rules in Microsoft Exchange (Online or Server) or Google Workspace. This is relevant if you want to enforce secure mail “policy-first,” or if applications (HR/ERP/CRM) need to send secure mail via SMTP without a user manually turning anything on.

Operationally, this usually means: designing policies (what should always be secured, when to alert), testing with mail flow rules (including exceptions to avoid loops) and setting up recipient authentication as a standard process. Management puts a strain on the IT/Security team.

Msafe: file-first with identity integration

Implementing Msafe Secure File Transfer is easy and fast. Msafe runs on a proprietary platform and is maintained entirely by Msafe engineers. In enterprise environments, this usually includes identity and lifecycle management: SSO via Microsoft Entra ID and SCIM for provisioning/deprovisioning.

The practical effect: you add a controlled file-transfer layer (often using Outlook as the front end), while centrally managing governance (retention/expiration, revocation, audit export).

Usage Differences

Fundamentally, these are two different approaches. Msafe believes that e-mail, by definition, is not a secure medium. No matter how well you protect it. All over the world there are millions of mailboxes full of, confidential, documents. Data leakage often occurs through a hacked e-mail account.

Zivver users thus have to jump through a number of hoops to share confidential documents and sharing. The same goes for external users, by the way. There is a lot of criticism about how they have to get to the shared document.

Msafe Secure File Transfer is there exclusively for sharing (large and/or confidential) documents. With a company policy in place, all users know to use Msafe when sharing or accessing files. This is clear and does not cause confusion.

Msafe and Microsoft as a combination

Msafe is especially a logical alternative when you want to standardize file exchange with externals with strong governance and EU hosting as an explicit starting point.

When you want to prevent human error before shipment, organizations can use the Purview compliance portal from Microsoft. You then set up automatic confidentiality labeling and data loss prevention (DLP) policies. Consult with your Microsoft specialist to set this up properly for your organization.

Want to know more? Book an informal meeting to discuss the best options for your organization.

Share:

More Posts

Why secure file sharing is only truly safe with security awareness training
Blog

Security awareness training makes secure file sharing truly compliant

Files are still shared by people. And that’s precisely where risk arises. An employee who clicks on a phishing email, shares a document with the wrong recipient, leaves overly broad permissions, or works outside the secure channel because it seems faster, can put pressure on even the best-equipped environment. That’s why secure file sharing, security awareness and compliance training belong together.

Read More »
Complexity Kills Compliance
Blog

Complexity Kills Compliance

Compliance rarely goes wrong because organizations don’t have policies. It goes wrong because policies become too complicated in practice. Once employees have to deal with cumbersome processes, extra steps, loose portals and unclear exceptions, they look for a faster route. And that’s exactly where the problem begins. What seems secure and compliant on paper quickly turns into shadow IT, workarounds and invisible risks in daily operations.

Read More »
How do companies comply with GDPR guidelines
Blog

How do companies comply with GDPR guidelines? And why secure file transfer is essential in this

To comply with GDPR guidelines, a privacy statement or secure tool is not enough. Companies must process personal data lawfully, respect privacy rights, take appropriate security measures, manage data breaches and be able to demonstrate that they have their processes in order. The Personal Data Authority lists foundations, privacy rights, security, DPIAs in high-risk situations and accountability among the core components of AVG compliance.

Read More »
provable-compliance-without-complexity-hennie-jansen
Blog

Proving compliance without complexity: interview with Hennie Jansen, CCO of Msafe

Following our Compliance Summit, ITinsight conducted an interview with Hennie Jansen, Msafe’s CCO. The theme is provable compliance without complexity. Hennie Jansen indicates that it is not a slogan. “It’s a way to bring security, compliance and business closer together. And organizations that get that right in 2026 are building not only better audits, but also more trust, more control and more operational peace of mind.”

Read More »
KPMG research- why compliance in 2026 calls for Secure File Sharing
Blog

KPMG study: why compliance in 2026 calls for Secure File Sharing

Why is a Secure File Sharing solution indispensable in a good compliance policy? KPMG says in essence, organizations are facing more compliance pressures, increased privacy and cybersecurity requirements, and a growing need for monitoring, reporting and control. Our Msafe Secure File Transfer solution is perfect for an environment where sensitive files are exchanged encrypted, access-controlled and fully traceable.

Read More »
Automate secure file sharing with the Msafe API
Blog

Automate secure file sharing with the Msafe API

More and more organizations want to automate file sharing. No longer manually uploading, sending and storing, but rather integrating secure file sharing directly into existing processes and systems. Msafe’s API makes this possible. Through an API, applications can automatically upload, share and link files to internal systems such as CRM or document management systems.

Read More »